This research involved a five year follow-up study of 557 clients receiving chemical dependency treatment under the Alcohol and Drug Addiction Treatment and Support Act (ADATSA). The question of whether chemical dependency treatment reduces Medicaid expenses is examined by comparing Medicaid medical costs for those who received chemical dependency treatment in 1989-90 (n=344) with a similar group who were eligible but did not receive treatment in the same time period (n=213). Treated clients were found to be less costly, on average $4,500 less for medical care alone than untreated clients. Treatment had the largest effect, and produced the largest savings, for those who had Medicaid medical expenses prior to treatment cost, on average $7,900 less than a similar group of untreated clients over the five year follow-up period.
Report and/or Additional Information:
Categories:
Related Publications:
- 2003 County Profile of Substance Use and Need for Treatment Services (4.52)
- A Comprehensive Program For Alcohol and Drug Abusing Mothers And Their Young Children (7.98)
- Chemical Dependency Treatment and Cost Savings Estimates in Washington (4.28)
- Employment Outcomes of Chemical Dependency Treatment and Additional Vocational Services Publicly Funded by Washington State (4.29)
- Employment Outcomes of Chemical Dependency Treatment: Analyses from Washington State (4.45)
- Patient & Family Satisfaction Surveys at Western State Hospital (3.25)
- Profile of Substance Use and Need for Treatment Services in Washington State (4.32)
- Profile on Risk and Protection for Substance Abuse Prevention Planning in Washington State (4.15)
- Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention (4.47)
- Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention Planning in Washington State (4.33)
- Safe Babies, Safe Moms (4.36)
- Substance Abuse Treatment & Hospital Admissions: Analyses from Washington State (4.46fs)
- Substance Use, Substance Use Disorders, and Need for Treatment among Washington State Adults (4.25)
- TANF Supported Employment Pilot Participant Characteristics (6.60)